The discussion around "universalism" being a path to "mental slothfulness" is quite the paradox, similar to some ideas in your "Rule of Law Shrugged" post. How would you apply that logic to a classroom where we strive for inclusivity?
A good question. It is hard to get a ‘student’ to learn about law… most think it is boring. Perhaps understanding that one would not need an attorney to handle life affairs would bring interest.
The discussion around "universalism" being a path to "mental slothfulness" is quite the paradox, similar to some ideas in your "Rule of Law Shrugged" post. How would you apply that logic to a classroom where we strive for inclusivity?
A good question. It is hard to get a ‘student’ to learn about law… most think it is boring. Perhaps understanding that one would not need an attorney to handle life affairs would bring interest.